Why purple doesn’t exist

The colour purple does not exist in the real world. Apparently it’s true. A rainbow of light from red to violet floods our surroundings, but there is no such thing as purple light. Purple only exists in our heads. I got fascinated by what I found in exploring this purple puzzle, so I thought I’d share it …

From school we know that light is electromagnetic radiation. Part of the same spectrum that includes radio waves, and microwaves down below red, and ultraviolet and X-rays up beyond the violet end of visible light. We perceive colour thanks to three different types of colour receptor cells, or cones, in our eyes. Each type of cone is sensitive to a range of colours but one is most excited by red light, one by green and one blue.

We can see, for example, yellow light, which sits in the spectrum between red and green, because yellow light excites both our red and green cones. Green light obviously scores a major hit with the green cones, but also to a lesser extent gets the red and blue going because of the way their ranges of sensitivity overlap. As you keep heading up you go through that vibrant blue/green called Cyan (as in printer cartridges), through the blues and off into the violet by which time the red and green cones have stopped firing altogether and all that’s left is a very weak response from the blues as they reach the end of their sensitivity and we head off into the invisible ultra-violet.

So where was purple?

Violet and purple are not the same. As we know, violet is out beyond the blues. Purple is a mixture of red and blue – a very different animal. But when you look at the spectrum midway between red and blue you find green. There’s no space for purple, and yet we can definitely “see” purple. How can this be?

A clue lies in the 2 ways we can see, or perceive, yellow. What we perceive as colour is the response of our whole visual system to different frequencies of light. As well as the physical response of the cones sending electrical signals to the brain, there is the experience that our brains turn those signals into…an experience we call colour.

Photons vibrating 450 trillion times a second bump into a receptor in our eye and we experience red – a miracle in its own right. Others vibrating around 575 trillion times a second arrive and we experience green. Others vibrating at a frequency somewhere between those two arrive and we experience yellow. These “yellow” photons excite both the red and green cones, but we experience this as yellow. So imagine instead that red and green light enter our eyes simultaneously. Just as with yellow light both our red and green cones get excited. So what’s the difference? Well, in terms of our experience, there is none. We do in fact “see” yellow. We might casually say that if you mix red and green light you “get” yellow, but that’s not strictly true. What you get is excited red and green cones and you perceive that as yellow.

Okay, so what about purple? Well, if you mix red and blue light you excite red and blue cones and you experience purple. There’s no doubting that. But unlike yellow, if you look for light whose frequency is half way between red and blue to do the same job you are slap bang in the middle of the greens, and not surprisingly what you see is green, not purple at all.

So the only way we can experience purple is by seeing red and blue simultaneously. There is no such thing as purple light. No single frequency of electromagnetic radiation can give you that purple feeling. The experience of purple is an anomaly of the way we see colour and as such I would suggest that it is the most intimate and personal of colours, created purely in the depths of our perceptual system. This is not true of any other colour but regal, sensual purple.

That also, surely, gives purple a unique place in the artist’s palette. A purple pigment is not reflecting purple light into our eyes but red and blue without green. Purple is a kind of ungreen. And that gives it a remarkable relationship to the greens. These are colours that talk to one another because they have a related vocabulary. They are both talking to our red and blue cones, but one also talks to the green and the other not.

Okay, enough talking. Enough thinking and enough writing. Time to get the paints out and play.

follow Grant’s art blog

20 responses

    1. Some beans and marijuana plants turn purple when maturing so does that mean they’re not producing photosynthesis as it is absent of green

  1. This is just wonderful. I’ve discovered the same information over the years when reading up, however, your presentation of this information is probably the best I’ve ever come across. Thank you for this.

    1. That’s very kind of you, Crispin. I haven’t been paying attention to this website. Been more focused on climate change work. You inspire me to get back to it and be a bit more balanced. Thank you.

      1. Thanks, that’s very helpful and informative and I am glad you had shared this with me, cause my favorite color is and always has been purple

  2. Hi – helpful article – thanks, but I’m just reading up about the same thing and this is not exactly correct. At the end of the rainbow of light after blue is violet – this is a single frequency of light and it excites the blue cones, but also the reds a little bit. The frequency response of the red cones includes a little bump at the end which responds to the violet frequency. Very interesting!

  3. “No single frequency of electromagnetic radiation can give you that purple feeling” No but there is a frequency that would give you that violet feeling.

  4. Welp. Of all the places that have tried to explain this, I’ve come to a ceramics blog to find the most well-explained answer.

  5. Whoever wrote this doesn’t seem understand the distinction between mixing lights and mixing pigments and sporadically conflates them: “PRIMARY COLORS OF LIGHT AND PIGMENT” – https://learn.leighcotnoir.com/artspeak/elements-color/primary-colors/

    Plus, combining light is not as simple as adding the frequencies and dividing by 2—”if you look for light whose frequency is half way between red and blue to do the same job you are slap bang in the middle of the greens, and not surprisingly what you see is green, not purple at all.” …except you don’t see green when you combine red and blue…you see magenta…. Where/how/when does this guy get/see green?!? Because that’s not true of the light or pigment color models.

    “Violet and purple are not the same.”…Yes–they are…two names for the same slice of the EM spectrum, aka “color”, that we’re referring to.

    “No single frequency of electromagnetic radiation can give you that purple feeling.” No…it’s that no single type of cone in your eye’s photoreceptor can perceive that violet/purple slice/frequency/wavelength of the EM spectrum; it takes a combination of the three types of cones, one sensitive to Red, Green, and Blue respectively…. By his verbiage, this guy seems to conceptualize the EM spectrum as only consisting of RGB, and that anything else is “created purely in the depths of our perceptual system.”

    “This is not true of any other colour but regal, sensual purple”…“and as such I would suggest that it is the most intimate and personal of colours.” Really? Because wouldn’t most of your illogic also apply to Orange?

    1. Nice. I agree totally. This guy is leaving out the fact that there are millions of colors , a lot of which dont have a single frequency for it. But when more than one frequency enters our optics a new color is CREATED that didn’t exist until the mixture of the different wavelengths enter our optics and brain which knows what to do with it to give us the new color we see or we wouldn’t see anything. It’s not just random happenstance.

  6. Except you are leaving out the fact that there are millions of colors , a lot of which dont have a single wavelength for it. But when more than one wavelength enters our optics a new color is CREATED that didn’t exist until the mixture of the different wavelengths enter our optics and brain which knows what to do with it to give us the new color we see or we wouldn’t see anything. It’s not just random happenstance. So I guess you are partially right but to state there is a color that doesn’t exist is ust categorically wrong. Nothing exists until its created.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

more posts like this...

ceramics

Impressions – a completely new way of working

It was the coldest, bleakest part of this last winter. That was when my right arm was gripped with such intense pain that I had to stop working with the clay. I was not happy! But it turned out that this was an opportunity to completely rethink my making process.

read more >
ceramics

giving bowls / sharing bowls

The Giving Bowls have just raised over £350 for the Stroud District Foodbank. I’m delighted. They seems to have found a real purpose in life, and their development is a story that is still giving life lessons to me.

read more >